Mr Tan Kin Lian asked the above in his letter to the Forum published in ST on April 7, 2009.
Essentially, I think he said the following:-
a) He is asking for the outcome of MAS/AG's investigation on the petition signed by 983 people affected by the Minibond/Hi-Note saga.
b) You do not act by issuing more guidelines for the industry.
c) Has the law been violated or even activated to address the problem?
My views.
The financial industry is an important component of Singapore's economy. So important that the various of organs of government have to tread carefully in handling the matter. It is not just a matter of addressing the problems of a few thousands individuals and a few prestigious financial institutions.
The guidelines are useful to prevent (hopefully) the recurrence in the interim.
But the state of our financial sector is also so important to other countries that Singapore made it to the "Grey List" of nations with practices that other countries are concerned about. (I think this is an appropriate way to put it.)
The question is whether a crime has been committed. Let me attempt to give you a parallel analogy.
Let's say that a man sold you a stone that was supposed to heal a thousand ailment but it did not. What would you do? You would report to the police and the man would be prosecuted after due investigation.
Similarly (in my humble opinion), if a financial adviser sold you a product that is said to be "capital guaranteed" and "better than fixed deposit" but actually not so. Then what would you do?
So the question again - Has a crime been committed? We await the outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment